bugs using filter

[JD Kromkowski]

1. In either record view or form view. Filter records, then choose table view. Shut down. But if you start in table view and then filter, there is no problem. You can switch to record or form view, ok. BUT if you try to switch back to table view, you will get a shut down. 2. Set a filter. Delete “all” – does in fact, delete “All” not just what the filter has selected. And if you have filter on and you try to delete, even if you only delete current, you get a shut down.

[Michael]

On 22/03/2013 14:34, kromkowski wrote:
> 1. In either record view or form view. Filter records, then choose
> table view. Shut down. But if you start in table view and then
> filter, there is no problem. You can switch to record or form view, ok.
> BUT if you try to switch back to table view, you will get a shut down.
>
>
> 2. Set a filter. Delete "all" – does in fact, delete "All" not just
> what the filter has selected.
>
> And if you have filter on and you try to delete, even if you only delete
> current, you get a shut down.
>

Thanks John,

I will have a look. Delete All probably should do exactly that. If you want to do a Remove->Group (which I don't think we have
added yet, but with filter support it would be viable now), that would use a filter.

Ciao, Neil

[JD Kromkowski]

On 03/25/13 6:26 PM, Neil Robinson wrote:
> On 22/03/2013 14:34, kromkowski wrote:
>> 1. In either record view or form view. Filter records, then choose
>> table view. Shut down. But if you start in table view and then
>> filter, there is no problem. You can switch to record or form view, ok.
>> BUT if you try to switch back to table view, you will get a shut down.
>>
>>
>> 2. Set a filter. Delete "all" – does in fact, delete "All" not just
>> what the filter has selected.
>>
>> And if you have filter on and you try to delete, even if you only delete
>> current, you get a shut down.
>>
>
> Thanks John,
>
> I will have a look. Delete All probably should do exactly that. If you want to do a Remove->Group (which I don't think we have
> added yet, but with filter support it would be viable now), that would use a filter.
>
> Ciao, Neil
>

Is there documentation on programatically using FILTER?

JDK

[Michael]

On 27/03/2013 16:39, kromkowski wrote:
> On 03/25/13 6:26 PM, Neil Robinson wrote:
>> On 22/03/2013 14:34, kromkowski wrote:
>>> 1. In either record view or form view. Filter records, then choose
>>> table view. Shut down. But if you start in table view and then
>>> filter, there is no problem. You can switch to record or form view, ok.
>>> BUT if you try to switch back to table view, you will get a shut down.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Set a filter. Delete "all" – does in fact, delete "All" not just
>>> what the filter has selected.
>>>
>>> And if you have filter on and you try to delete, even if you only delete
>>> current, you get a shut down.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks John,
>>
>> I will have a look. Delete All probably should do exactly that. If you want to do a Remove->Group (which I don't think we have
>> added yet, but with filter support it would be viable now), that would use a filter.
>>
>> Ciao, Neil
>>
>
> Is there documentation on programatically using FILTER?
>
> JDK
>

Not really. Filters as such are basically uninteresting, since they are specific to the user interface. Anything you might want to
use a filter for can probably be done more efficiently using either the report1, or sql1 types directly.

Ciao, Neil

[Author]

Posts